Supported venues
Polymarket, Kalshi, Manifold, Limitless, Gemini, Pascal and SX Bet.
Prediction Market Radar is an independent, read-only cross-platform research service. Its Super Match Engine groups materially equivalent questions while retaining venue identity, original links, timestamps and compatibility warnings.
Remote interviews and demonstrations available worldwide

Polymarket, Kalshi, Manifold, Limitless, Gemini, Pascal and SX Bet.
No accounts, wallets, custody, order routing or trade execution.
Original wording, venue identity, timing and source links remain visible.
Uncertain relationships can be withheld and reviewed instead of forced into coverage.
Reuters reported on 17 August 2026 that researchers identified 7,466 U.S. midterm-related markets across Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US through 10 August—16 times the 2024-cycle count—and $133 million already wagered on the 2026 midterms.
On 19 August, Reuters reported that Cantor Fitzgerald had launched institutional prediction-market trading through Kalshi and cited Bernstein forecasting annual sector volume could reach $1 trillion by decade end.
Bruce Mallord is the founder, sole human developer and operator of Prediction Market Radar, an independent service that identifies materially equivalent prediction markets across multiple venues. He built the Super Match Engine to make fragmented market data more intelligible while keeping source evidence, attribution and uncertainty visible.
Bruce Mallord founded and independently developed Prediction Market Radar after encountering a deceptively difficult data problem: prediction contracts can look identical while resolving differently, or use different wording while representing materially the same outcome. He created the Super Match Engine to normalise and compare markets across supported venues without hiding their original identity, rules, links or timestamps. Bruce remains the project’s sole human developer and operator. The service is read-only and does not execute transactions. His current work focuses on contract identity, provenance, human-verification evidence, publisher-ready delivery and the reference infrastructure needed as prediction-market inventory expands.
Why price comparison can be wrong before it starts when contracts differ on date, geography, threshold or settlement source.
How identifiers, lineage, normalization and quality controls become necessary as venue and contract counts grow.
What defensible comparison evidence looks like, including sampled review, withholding and source transparency.
How source-attributed feeds, widgets and selective evaluations can support responsible downstream use.
Remote interviews and demonstrations are available. Please include the outlet, topic, intended format and deadline. Suspected matching errors should use the dedicated correction workflow so they enter the evidence trail.